Page 484 - 2020新世代·新需求:臺灣教育發展的挑戰研討會
P. 484

專題研究報告一

                                                     第三篇 厚植國際化趨勢下的國家競爭力




              countries, sufficient ‘talent’ or ‘brain power’are critical. In echoing the debate of
              low aid effectiveness, lack of sufficient and competent personnel domestically might

              partially explain why sustainable development for these low income countries is
              problematic. As we can observe in the field, quality university graduates at local
              institutions are able to help these following matters:
                   ‧ Making quality decision-making and implementation accordingly;

                   ‧Converting and absorbing foreign knowledge and skills for local use;
                   ‧ Diffusing or disseminating effective strategies to domestic settings;
                   ‧ Continuously modifying adopted mechanisms and practices for greater
                     development ‘on their own’



                   With these highly skilled workforce, the Global South tend to be able to
              bridge, meditate and retain these ‘borrowed’ or ‘imported’ ideas, norms and
              practices for domestic use. It is these well-educated or trained talents they can run

              their own systems and institutions rather than over reliance on external experts.
              One of frequently mentioned reasons why the developing countries cannot reduce
              poverty, increase literacy, improve health condition, or combating the disease
              is concerned with the quality governance of their own country. Again, quality

              human capital or talent is the key to such sustainable development for low-income
              countries. However, our empirical analysis might indicate that the provision and
              retention of talent in Global South might be ‘conditioned’ or even ‘manipulated’ by
              industrialized countries.



              Ⅴ Two contradictory policy discourses at domestic
              level: National economic liberation and humanitarian









                                                   483
   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489